0300 30 20 752 support@skarating.org
Select Page
Wagamama Clarks Village: SKArating Gold for a gas-free restaurant fit-out

Wagamama Clarks Village: SKArating Gold for a gas-free restaurant fit-out

SKArating Case Study | Retail v1.0

Wagamama Clarks Village: SKArating Gold for a gas-free restaurant fit-out

Wagamama’s new restaurant at Clarks Village in Street, Somerset, has achieved SKArating Gold under the Retail v1.0 scheme. The fit-out turned a former retail unit into an all-electric restaurant with no gas, tables made from recycled chopsticks, and detailed energy and water monitoring from day one.

The assessment was led by Stewart Muir, Senior Technical Consultant at Bioregional, working with Alex Neil, Group Head of Construction at Wagamama. The two spoke to Elina Grigoriou of the SKArating Board on the SKArating podcast about how the project came together, and their account forms the basis of this case study.

Project at a glance

ProjectWagamama Clarks Village
ClientWagamama
LocationClarks Village, Street, Somerset BA16 0BB
Project typeFit-out of a former retail unit as a restaurant
SchemeSKArating Retail v1.0
Rating achievedGold
SKArating AssessorStewart Muir, Bioregional
Project manager and QSRockshore
ArchitectQuadrant Design
Main contractorMeridian
LandlordLandsec
Project valueApproximately £1.4 million

Hear the full story on the SKArating podcast. Alex Neil of Wagamama and Stewart Muir of Bioregional talk through how the Clarks Village fit-out came together, and how Wagamama approaches sustainability across its restaurants and day-to-day operations, from energy and water monitoring to recycled chopstick tables and team league tables.

Listen to the episode: How Wagamama Used SKArating to Raise the Bar →

The challenge: proving progress, not just claiming it

Wagamama builds between six and ten restaurants a year and now runs around 80 sites. Its “treading softly” commitment aims to cut emissions by 5% a year from a 2023 baseline and reach net zero by 2040. The construction team wanted its fit-outs to play their part, but it lacked an independent way to measure where it stood.

There was also a perception to overcome. Inside the business, sustainability was often assumed to be expensive, onerous and hard to achieve. Wagamama wanted a standardised, recognised framework that would show what good looks like, and evidence that its claims were real.

Clarks Village added its own constraints. The unit had always been a shop and had never housed a restaurant, so it needed new services throughout, and the opening date had been committed to the landlord.

The new Wagamama restaurant at Clarks Village
The new Wagamama at Clarks Village, converted from a former retail unit.

What difference did SKArating make?

SKArating turned good intentions into verified performance. Before Clarks Village, Bioregional ran retrospective baseline assessments of Wagamama’s West Bridgford and Telford restaurants. These showed the brand was already close to Silver, so Silver became the initial target.

The ambition then rose. On learning that other restaurant brands had achieved Gold, Alex Neil changed the target mid-planning. The project went on to achieve Gold, meeting over 60 measures and exceeding the gateway measures Gold requires.

The scheme’s breadth also changed how the team worked. SKArating cannot be met with five or ten headline initiatives: every category needs action. That pushed the project into areas it might otherwise have overlooked, from the provenance of furniture veneers to the efficiency of hand dryers. The hand dryer the team found proved both cheaper and more sustainable than the model Wagamama had been buying.

Full certification also gave a different result from benchmarking alone. With the Assessor involved, some items the team believed it had achieved in the baseline turned out to fall short, and were adjusted to get them over the line.

In the client’s words

“I don’t want to do anything unless we’re able to prove that we did it to the best of our ability, and that it’s as honest as it can be. What the accreditation gives you is that feeling that we’ve actually done it. It’s a proud moment for me personally and for the business.”

Alex Neil, Group Head of Construction, Wagamama

Quote taken from the SKArating podcast and lightly edited for readability.

What value did the scheme deliver?

The project achieved SKArating Gold with over 60 measures met, and delivered savings Wagamama can carry across its estate.

Theme What was delivered at Clarks Village Photo
Energy and carbon An all-electric fit-out with no gas, including induction wok stations in the kitchen. Landsec funded a new electricity cable from the local network to make this possible. Induction wok stations in the all-electric kitchen
Control and monitoring An energy management and control system by Clearworld. Wagamama’s dashboard shows when teams override air conditioning settings, and regional league tables now turn efficiency into friendly competition.
Water Detailed water monitoring and reporting, with flow data visible minute by minute. Each device costs around £1,000 and pays back within months by exposing overnight use and hidden leaks. Water monitoring equipment
Materials and circularity Table tops by ChopValue, made from around 83,000 chopsticks collected from ten Wagamama restaurants. Each table is engraved with its count, from roughly 4,000 to over 10,000. Reclaimed brick slips and furniture meeting an 80% recycled or reused threshold. ChopValue table made from recycled chopsticks
Responsible sourcing Documented provenance and certification for materials, with suppliers pressed for evidence down their own supply chains.
Transport and wellbeing Facilities enabling staff to cycle to work.

The cost was modest and partly one-off. Alex Neil puts the premium at roughly £40,000 to £60,000 on a £1.4 million project, around 3 to 4%. He estimates about half was first-time learning, such as sourcing compliant bespoke lighting, which will not recur on future sites.

The operational case is strong. Monitoring of the kind installed here has identified around £40,000 a year of overnight energy waste at a single Wagamama site, simply from equipment left running when restaurants are closed.

How the project team picked it up

Wagamama introduced SKArating in stages. It first researched what peers were doing, speaking to Nando’s, which had used the scheme in Cambridge. It then commissioned the West Bridgford and Telford baselines before committing to a certified assessment at Clarks Village.

The first requests to suppliers drew a slow response. So Wagamama brought the whole team into one room: Rockshore as project manager and quantity surveyor, Quadrant Design as architect, Meridian as main contractor, and Bioregional as Assessor. Alex Neil made the brand’s commitment clear and asked suppliers to flag any extra cost rather than ignore a requirement.

From there the assessment ran on a single master tracker managed by Rockshore. It listed every measure in scope and the evidence received, and was reviewed weekly or fortnightly before, during and after the build. Suppliers sent evidence, Bioregional reviewed it, and gaps were chased until each measure could be closed out.

The landlord was part of the process too. Wagamama told Landsec from acquisition that it wanted an all-electric restaurant. Landsec paid for a new connection to the local network and supported the shell, core and rooftop plant space the scheme required.

The role of the Assessor

Stewart Muir of Bioregional was the SKArating Assessor, building on Bioregional’s earlier baseline work for Wagamama. Alex Neil is clear that the Gold rating would not have been reached without that support. His role covered five areas:

  1. Setting the benchmark. Bioregional’s baselines showed Wagamama where it stood before any changes, at low cost and without the pressure of an opening date.
  2. Interpreting the criteria. Where measures could be read more than one way, the Assessor guided the team, saving time and money on items that might not have counted.
  3. Bringing in wider practice. Bioregional presented how other organisations approach energy, materials, waste and wellbeing, giving the team new options to try.
  4. Reviewing evidence. Every claim needed evidence before it could be credited. Stewart reviewed submissions, worked directly with suppliers where needed, and confirmed what was achieved.
  5. Debriefing and feeding back. After completion, a debrief with Wagamama separated one-off costs from repeatable ones. Practical issues, such as how bespoke light fittings are scoped, were fed back to SKArating to inform the scheme’s development.

In the Assessor’s words

“It’s not just about having maybe five or ten good things you’re doing. It’s so comprehensive, you’ve got to do something on everything. What stood out was the engagement to be ambitious: specifying ambitious energy and water management and control systems, good material use and good design.”

Stewart Muir, Senior Technical Consultant, Bioregional

Quote taken from the SKArating podcast and lightly edited for readability.

Lessons for future projects

Try before you buy. Run a benchmark on an existing site first. The SKArating criteria are free to explore, and a trial removes the time pressure of a live opening.

Allow time for the administration. Evidence gathering takes real effort. Alex Neil admits the team rushed some decisions, including lighting, that could have been procured more cheaply with more time.

Engage contractors early. Contractors arrived with very different levels of sustainability knowledge. Bioregional recommends briefing them sooner, and favouring contractors already familiar with the measures.

Use procurement leverage. Wagamama tenders annually and now favours suppliers who can provide evidence. It is also simplifying its design, for example using full boards to cut waste.

Challenge the default. The cheaper, better hand dryer showed that sustainable choices do not always cost more.

From one restaurant to business as usual

Clarks Village has given Wagamama a repeatable framework for future fit-outs and helped it meet the SKArating goals in its ESG plan. The next step is making these practices routine. Energy dashboards and team league tables are already making efficiency part of everyday restaurant culture, delivering commercial returns alongside environmental ones.

If you are planning a restaurant or retail fit-out, find out more about the SKArating Retail scheme or speak to a SKArating Accredited Assessor at skarating.org.

Images: Stewart Muir, Bioregional. Case study published with the permission of Wagamama.

Caedmon Hall Refurbishment: SKArating Gold for Leeds Beckett University

Caedmon Hall Refurbishment: SKArating Gold for Leeds Beckett University

SKArating Case Study | Higher Education v1.0

Caedmon Hall Refurbishment: SKArating Gold for Leeds Beckett University

Leeds Beckett University’s refurbishment of Caedmon Hall, a Grade II listed building on its Headingley Campus, has achieved SKArating Gold under the Higher Education v1.0 scheme. The project shows how a historic building with tight heritage constraints can still deliver measurable environmental, social and wellbeing outcomes when sustainability is assessed holistically rather than through carbon alone.

The assessment was led by Rory Baker, SKArating Accredited Assessor at Drees & Sommer UK Ltd, working on behalf of the University. The certificate was issued in 2025.

Project at a glance

Project Caedmon Hall Refurbishment
Client Leeds Beckett University
Location Headingley Campus, Leeds, UK
Building Grade II listed teaching and office building
Scheme SKArating Higher Education v1.0
Rating achieved Gold
SKArating Assessor Rory Baker, Drees & Sommer UK Ltd
Certificate issued 2025

The challenge: a listed building with an old footprint

Caedmon Hall’s Grade II listing meant the University could not simply strip out and replace its fabric. The building carried single-glazed timber-framed windows, relied on gas boilers for heat, and had limited control over how energy was used across its spaces.

The University wanted more than a carbon-reduction exercise. It was looking for a certification that would verify its commitment to positive impact and evidence a holistic approach covering people, environment and community. SKArating’s Higher Education scheme, which assesses fit-outs and refurbishments against a broad set of measures, offered that framework.

Caedmon Hall's Grade II listed front facade

 

 

Caedmon Hall’s Grade II listed front façade on the Headingley Campus.

What difference did SKArating make?

SKArating widened the University’s view of what a sustainable refurbishment could include. Beyond the expected energy upgrades, the scheme pointed the team towards routes to impact it had not previously considered.

Three stand out:

  • Social value. The project encouraged local apprenticeships during the works and sourced materials and labour as close to the campus as possible.
  • Responsible materials. All timber used in the project was FSC certified.
  • Behavioural measures. The University adopted a closed-door policy across the building to retain heat, a low-cost action that suits a listed building where fabric upgrades are restricted.

The scheme also gave the project a structured, measure-by-measure method. Each target needed evidence, so commitments made at the outset had to be demonstrated on site, not simply stated.

The main entrance doors of Caedmon Hall

 

 

The main entrance doors, part of the building’s closed-door policy to retain heat.

What value did the scheme deliver?

The project achieved SKArating Gold, with measures evidenced across energy, water, wellbeing, materials, waste, biodiversity and social value. The site inspection recorded 66 items of evidence across the building and grounds.

Theme What was delivered at Caedmon Hall Photo
Energy and carbon An air source heat pump with buffer vessels now serves the heating circuits, cutting reliance on gas. LED lighting throughout, with lighting controls and presence detection. Insulated plant pipework and triple-panel radiators. Air source heat pump and plant at Caedmon Hall
Control and monitoring A new building management system shows temperature set points room by room on every floor, plus heating, heat pump and metering screens. Sub-metering covers electricity by floor, water and heat. Building management system screen
Thermal performance A closed-door policy supported by automatic entrance doors, and blinds specified for their insulating properties. Automatic entrance doors and insulating blinds
Water Sensor-flush WCs and urinals, push-action taps, a dedicated water meter and point-of-use water heaters. Sensor-flush WC and push-action taps
Wellbeing Wall-mounted sensors monitoring temperature, humidity and CO2, acoustic ceiling batons in teaching spaces, showers, lockers and a range of breakout spaces. Breakout space with acoustic ceiling batons
Materials and circularity FSC-certified timber throughout. Furniture and IT equipment schedules so items can be reused in other University buildings. FSC-certified timber and labelled furniture
Waste Segregated recycling inside the building and external recycling storage. Segregated recycling bins
Biodiversity A ladybird box and newly planted, mulched beds at the building frontage. Ladybird box and planted beds at the frontage
Social value Local apprenticeships during the works, and materials and labour sourced locally to the campus.

The value has also reached beyond the building. The University has used the assessment to report its ESG performance through internal communications and marketing, giving staff, students and the public a transparent account of what was targeted and achieved.

How the project team picked it up

SKArating was built into the project as a shared responsibility rather than a single specialist’s task. University staff, quantity surveyors, engineers and interior designers each took ownership of specific measures, with the SKArating Assessor coordinating across them.

The SKArating online tool was central to this. It gave the team one place to capture evidence against each measure and to share progress with the wider project team at every stage. Where measures cut across disciplines, the structure prompted collaboration between teams to get them over the line.

The University found that this approach reflected SKArating’s values in practice:

  • Shared benefit through local apprenticeships and local sourcing.
  • Transparency in what was reported to internal teams and the public.
  • Integrity through evidence required for every targeted measure.
  • Robustness through clear ownership, which kept each discipline accountable for its measures.
A refurbished meeting room in Caedmon Hall

 

 

A refurbished meeting room, delivered with input from engineers and interior designers.

The role of the Assessor

Rory Baker of Drees & Sommer UK Ltd acted as the SKArating Assessor on behalf of Leeds Beckett University. His role spanned four areas:

  1. Guiding the targets. He helped the University identify measures it had not previously considered, from social value to behavioural actions such as the closed-door policy.
  2. Coordinating the team. He allocated responsibility for measures across University staff, quantity surveyors, engineers and interior designers, and brought disciplines together where measures overlapped.
  3. Verifying on site. His September 2024 inspection documented 66 items, from sensor-flush WCs and the BMS metering screens to the heat pump faceplate and furniture labels, confirming that what was specified had been installed.
  4. Keeping the assessment honest. When a late change of paint manufacturer meant measure M14 Paints and Coverings could no longer be met, it was removed from target rather than claimed.
Sub-metering screen on the building management system

 

 

Sub-metering on the BMS, one of 66 items recorded during the Assessor’s site inspection.

This independent, evidence-led role gave the University confidence that its Gold rating reflects what was actually delivered.

In the Assessor’s words

“What made Caedmon Hall work was that everyone owned a piece of it. University staff, quantity surveyors, engineers and interior designers each had measures to deliver, and the online tool let us capture evidence and share progress at every stage. Removing the paints measure late on was a useful lesson. Bringing the assessment into early design conversations is how you secure the most measures.”

Rory Baker, SKArating Accredited Assessor, Drees & Sommer UK Ltd

Lessons for future projects

The biggest lesson was the value of early and regular collaboration. The paint change showed how a single procurement decision, made without reference to the assessment, can cost a measure. Had it been discussed sooner, the team could have chosen a compliant manufacturer.

On future projects the University plans to hold SKArating meetings from the early design stages. Bringing the Assessor into interior design and specification discussions should secure more targetable measures and avoid late surprises.

The project also changed how the University thinks about sustainability. It now places greater weight on tracking energy consumption and on keeping furniture and IT equipment in use across its estate, alongside carbon reduction.

A model for heritage refurbishment

Caedmon Hall shows that a listed building need not be a barrier to high sustainability performance. By combining low-carbon heating, smart controls and efficient fittings with social value, responsible materials and simple behavioural change, Leeds Beckett University has achieved SKArating Gold and a clear blueprint for its wider estate.

If you are planning a fit-out or refurbishment in higher education, find out more about the Higher Education v1.0 scheme or speak to a SKArating Assessor through the Assessor Directory at skarating.org.

Images: Rory Baker, Drees & Sommer UK Ltd. Case study published with the permission of Leeds Beckett University.

Social & Wellbeing Schemes Update: September 2026

Social & Wellbeing Schemes Update: September 2026

Development of Offices – Social & Wellbeing v1.0 and Higher Education & Life Sciences (HE&LS) – Social & Wellbeing v1.0 schemes continues to progress.

Sustainability in interior fit-out and refurbishment projects has, understandably, focused on environmental performance. We need interiors that reduce waste, use resources consciously, support lower carbon choices and help buildings perform better over time, even in extreme weather, as the European summer 2026 has so clearly demonstrated. But the spaces we design, build and manage are not experienced by materials or products: they are experienced by people.

Social & Wellbeing schemes: ‘The Whole Human’

The new SKArating Social & Wellbeing schemes are intended to address impacts of fit-out and refurbishment projects on humans. Specifically, they look at how projects support physical, emotional and mental health, comfort, dignity, inclusion, learning, community and wellbeing across their full lifecycle.

Central to this approach is the concept of the whole human — the recognition that health, comfort and wellbeing are not only physical, but encompass emotional and cognitive needs. For the physical body, this may include air quality, lighting, thermal comfort, acoustics and ergonomic furniture. For the emotional aspects, it is the things that shape how a space feels and how people experience it over time, from quiet rooms, restorative spaces and community spaces to safe communication and a sense of dignity and belonging. For the cognitive mind, this may include clarity, wayfinding, sensory zoning, user control, accessibility, and the ability to work or learn without unnecessary stress.

All three sit within the scope of our developing project assessment.

SKArating Vision: Triple Bottom Line Framework

The Social & Wellbeing schemes form the first major step towards SKArating’s long-term vision of a triple bottom line framework — planet, people and profit — applied to fit-out and refurbishment projects. That means assessing projects through three interconnected lenses, or pillars: environmental performance (planet), which SKArating already covers; social and wellbeing outcomes (people), now in development; and economic and value (profit), to follow.

The benefit of a triple bottom line approach is that it encourages a holistic view of sustainability. In addition, integrating these three pillars within a single framework, rather than assessing each with different systems and methodologies, can help reduce duplication of effort, overlapping lines of responsibility, and the administrative burden of trying to run multiple, conflicting and costly certification systems on a single project. It is unsustainable and the reason it does not happen widely enough in the market. We aim to address these challenges with an affordable, scalable schemes range that sits directly within the trusted SKArating system.

What Is Happening Now?

Following a series of workshops completed in 2025, SKArating recently established an industry Research & Development (R&D) Team to take forward the workshop recommendations that informed the schemes brief. The professional team brings together expertise from a broad range of industry backgrounds including design, consultancy, project delivery, workplace operations and specialist technical areas. The work is being undertaken on a voluntary basis, continuing the collaborative approach that has always been central to SKArating’s development.

During the R&D phase, detailed research into specialist topics is being undertaken in order to draft the Good Practice Measures (GPMs) that will ultimately form the scheme requirements.

Contributors are currently:

  • Researching evidence, standards and emerging good and best practices.
  • Producing research notes to record sources, inform recommendations and scheme development.
  • Collaborating through weekly team sessions and ongoing peer review activities.
  • Drafting and refining proposed Good Practice Measures.

What Areas Are Being Investigated?

The R&D Team is currently developing and refining Good Practice Measures across eight proposed impact categories:

  • Physical Design & Health (PH)
  • Physical Design & Supportive Facilities (PDF)
  • Design Character & Emotional Health (EH)
  • Healthy Food & Water (HFW)
  • Social, Community & Restorative Spaces (SCRS)
  • Communication, Connectivity & Technology (CCT)
  • Project Delivery & Operation (PDO)
  • Education, Skills & Workforce Development (ED)

The intention is to consider impacts not only on building occupants, but also on project teams, subcontractors, facilities managers, supply chains, local and wider communities. This whole-life and whole-stakeholder perspective is a defining feature of the new schemes and reflects the growing recognition that social sustainability extends well beyond the building user alone.

Programme and Next Steps

The current programme remains focused on delivering the first full draft of the schemes for wider industry review through a public consultation stage later this year.

The project has progressed from industry workshops and exploration activities into the detailed Research & Development phase. This will be followed by steering committee engagement and approval, public consultation and final scheme refinement before publication and launch. The aim is to ensure the schemes are practical, proportionate and informed by the expertise of the wider industry.

Looking Forward

The development of the Social & Wellbeing schemes represents more than the creation of another assessment tool. It is a key step in SKArating’s broader ambition to provide the interior fit-out and refurbishment market with a practical, proportionate and holistic sustainability framework.

By placing human health, wellbeing and social outcomes alongside environmental performance and economic costs and value, the new schemes aim to help project teams create spaces that are not only resource efficient, but genuinely supportive of the people and communities they serve.

As the triple bottom line vision continues to develop, this work provides the foundation for the next chapter of SKArating’s evolution.

If you have any questions, would like any information for your project, or are keen to learn about becoming an Assessor, get in touch – we would love to talk.

Here’s to a new era of sustainable fit out.

The Summer Heatwave: The red hot case for sustainable fit out

The Summer Heatwave: The red hot case for sustainable fit out

We have been building up to this.

More recently, young advocates such as Greta Thunberg have been clear about where we were headed. Not alarmist – clear. And weeks like this one we’ve been through are exactly the case study she, and countless scientists, designers, and sustainability professionals before and after her, have been warning about for decades. Except now, it’s not a warning. It’s the news.
 
Schools closed because it was too dangerous for children to travel or try and learn in overheated classrooms. Offices became greenhouses – all that floor-to-ceiling glass doing its job beautifully for natural light and external views until temperatures soared, at which point it became a liability. Air conditioning units run flat out, and electricity bills reflect this. Trains and commercial events are cancelled. The infrastructure and built environment we built for a different climate is simply not fit for this one or the one we’re heading towards.
 
At SKArating, we have been making this argument since our inception. Sustainable design is not a preference – it is engineering for reality. And weeks like this make it impossible to argue otherwise.

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

The irony of weeks such as in June 2026 is not lost on us. Buildings designed to project modernity – maximised glazing, open atria, south-facing facades with no shading or thermal comfort strategy – became the very embodiment of what sustainable design has long warned against. Solar gain unchecked. No passive cooling. No biophilic buffer. The result: indoor temperatures that make working dangerous, not merely uncomfortable, and energy bills that reflect the emergency mechanical cooling required to compensate.

These are not freak occurrences. They are design failures that were and still are predictable – and preventable.

The Triple Bottom Line

What distinguishes the SKArating methodology is its refusal to treat sustainability as a single-axis problem. The triple bottom line – people, planet, and profit – is a design framework that ensures every decision in an interior fit-out or refurbishment is evaluated across three interconnected lenses.
 
Planet. Reducing embodied carbon, maximising resource efficiency, selecting materials with verifiable provenance, and designing for circularity and longevity – not just for certification.
 
People. Thermal comfort, air quality, daylighting, acoustic wellbeing, and biophilic connection. Emotional health and comfort. A building that makes its occupants unsafe has failed, regardless of its energy rating.
 
Profit. Lower operational costs, reduced energy cost fluctuation exposure, higher occupant productivity, greater asset resilience, brand and image value and regulatory future-proofing. Sustainable design is the sound investment – and June 2026 weather patterns proved it in real time, on electricity bills and commercial or social activities across the country.
 
The SKArating framework assesses interior fit-outs and refurbishments across 80+ criteria to create drive and accountability at every stage of design, construction and operation. Not as a burden – as a discipline that makes better buildings.

What You Can Do – Starting Now

The knowledge exists. The methodology is proven. The business case has never been stronger. Here is where to start:
 
Sustainable Design Guidance
Access SKArating’s comprehensive design guidance – practical, measurable, and applicable to your next project from day one.
 
Assessor Training
Become a qualified SKArating Assessor or SKArating Competent Professional.
Gain the skills to evaluate, advise on, and certify sustainable interior fit-outs.
 
Get assessed on your next interior fit-out
Already planning a refurbishment? Bring SKArating in at early briefing and design stage – where the decisions that matter are still available to make.

Be the Change. Make the Change.

We have had 30 years of warnings. We do not need another 30 years of reports. The built environment is where the climate crisis is won or lost – and you are living in the built environment.
 
That makes this ours to shape. The tools are here. The training is here. The moment is unambiguous.

Join the SKArating community and make the change.

Get in touch:

t: 0300 30 20 752 

e: support@skarating.org

Updated Roadmap for SKArating schemes

Updated Roadmap for SKArating schemes

The Board’s aim is to steer, support and benchmark sustainable good practice in the interiors and fit-out industry for the benefit of all.

Following sizeable impact and based on industry response and resourcing capacity, the SKArating Board has revised the dates and timelines for updating SKArating schemes and developing new ones.

Roadmap latest:

  • The Offices Environmental 2.0 scheme has been welcomed by the industry and market. Benchmark levels are pushing new good practice and lifting standard practice in both circularity issues and the selection of products that align with the embodied carbon benchmarks.
  • There is strong interest from consultants looking to integrate environmental consistency in design guides that align with clients’ targets of net zero alignment and who recognise the leading position the UK and SKArating have in providing these.
  • Bronze is the New Gold – Good practice levels have been re-set and lifted to reflect current good practice and this will now be reflected in the ratings. It is harder to achieve a Silver and Gold rated project under the new 2.0 schemes. Golds are expected initially to be few and far between until the market uplifts practices. Our aim is to keep driving the market and set the standards. So, once this happens, we will move levels up again.
  • The approach of removing the Social & Wellbeing related measures from the Environmental schemes is being reflected across all our schemes. Social & Wellbeing related measures will move into a new set of schemes, and the environmental measures streamlined and kept in line with net zero, aiming towards 100% circularity. Numerous universities are already integrating the upgraded Environmental good practice benchmarks into their procurement processes and performance briefs.
  • The development of Social & Wellbeing schemes that complete, improve and simplify the actions and performance of issues around individuals and community groups related to a fit-out and refurbishment project is strongly supported by the Higher Education and Offices sectors. The current market sees incomplete, cumbersome and unsustainable schemes that leave project needs unmet and impede sector improvement.
  • The Higher Education (HE) schemes scope will be expanded to include Life Sciences fit-out and refurbishment projects. This will incorporate Laboratory and related research spaces. There is often a natural overlap of interior areas and use in these sectors and combining them provides an efficient approach to scheme development. The updated scheme will be called SKArating for Higher Education & Life Sciences (HE&LS).
  • The final development area is the Economic & Value pillar. Upfront financial costs has hitherto been the loudest driver for projects, often resulting in poor value, unpredictable quality and volatility in delivering good spaces and buildings – and leaving our industry often unable to deliver the best to our clients and the wider society we are here to serve. The Board’s aim is to widen the scope of ‘cost and value’ and correct economic thinking beyond just finance. This will allow projects, clients and our industry to uncover, untapped, hidden value and deliver more of our sector’s objectives with less strife and more joy.

The SKArating Board and Central Team remain open to expressions of interest to be involved in any of the roadmap work streams. Existing and new Partners and work-stream leads are always invited to support our activities as they align with theirs. Additionally, all medium or light contributions that fit with each stakeholder’s capacity are equally warmly invited and greatly valued.

SKArating is by the industry for the industry. We have demonstrated 20 years of quiet leadership in sustainable interior fit-outs, and are now stepping up to lead the evolution of the sector towards new heights of sustainable practice and value.